On the other hand, Vesto
Slipher observed the spectra of many spirals to be red-shifted. Thus it was concluded
that they are going away from us.
Searching for a standard candle
In principle, the expansion history of the cosmos can be determined quite
easily, using as a “standard candle” any distinguishable class of astronomical
objects of known intrinsic brightness that can be identified over a wide
distance range.Astronomers Saul Perlmutter and Brian Schmidt led international
teams to study type Ia supernovae. The uniformity of the type Ia supernovae
became striking when their spectra were studied in detail as they brightened
and then faded.
Fig 1: Light Curves
Absolute
magnitude, an inverse logarithmic measure of intrinsic brightness, is plotted
against time (in the star’s rest frame) before and after peak brightness. The
great majority (not all of them shown) fall neatly onto the yellow band. The
figure emphasizes the relatively rare outliers whose peak brightness or
duration differs noticeably from the norm. The nesting of the light curves
suggests that one can deduce the intrinsic brightness of an outlier from its
time scale. The brightest supernovae wax and wane more slowly than the
faintest. Simply by stretching the time scales of individual light curves to
fit the norm, and then scaling the brightness by an amount determined by the
required time stretch, one gets all the type Ia light curves to match.
Thus, the type Ia
Supernovae were chosen as excellent candidates for the ‘standard candle’
Hubble’s Law
Combining his own measurements of galaxy
distances with Vesto Slipher's measurements of the red shifts associated with
the galaxies, Hubble discovered a rough proportionality of the objects'
distances with their red shifts.
Hubble Law states that:
(1)
all objects observed in deep space are found to have a Doppler shift observable
relative velocity to Earth, and to each other;
(2)
that this Doppler-shift-measured velocity, of various galaxies receding from
the Earth, is proportional to their distance from the Earth and all other
interstellar bodies.
Although
widely attributed to Edwin Hubble, the law was first derived from the General
Relativity equations by Georges Lemaître in a 1927.
Thus we can easily conclude
that the universe is expanding. The velocity of a body going away is directly
proportional to its distance from us.
v ∝ x ⇒ Universe is Accelerating
Oops! There’s a problem- Too much
mass. Therefore, so much gravity is pulling things back. The universe should Decelerate
rather than Accelerate!
HOW’S
THIS POSSIBLE ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
Now to answer
this HOW, came three models of the universe.
a) Einstein applied the general theory of relativity to model the structure of the universe as a whole. He assumed that the universe was static, even though his first equations showed that in fact the cosmos was moving apart from some source. He thus, included the cosmological constant (an arbitrary constant which gives the energy density of empty space) as a term in his field equations for general relativity.
b) De Sitter modelled the universe as spatially flat and neglects ordinary matter, so the dynamics of the universe are dominated by the cosmological constant, thus expanding forever.
c) Friedman-Lemaitre gave three different models of the universe, all homogenous, expanding and containing matter.
a) Einstein applied the general theory of relativity to model the structure of the universe as a whole. He assumed that the universe was static, even though his first equations showed that in fact the cosmos was moving apart from some source. He thus, included the cosmological constant (an arbitrary constant which gives the energy density of empty space) as a term in his field equations for general relativity.
b) De Sitter modelled the universe as spatially flat and neglects ordinary matter, so the dynamics of the universe are dominated by the cosmological constant, thus expanding forever.
c) Friedman-Lemaitre gave three different models of the universe, all homogenous, expanding and containing matter.
Property
|
Model 1
|
Model 2
|
Model 3
|
Geometry
|
Surface of a sphere
|
Euclidean or flat
|
Surface of a saddle
|
Average Density
|
> Critical density
|
= Critical Density
|
< Critical Density
|
Size
|
Finite
|
Infinite
|
Infinite
|
Fate
|
Expand, then contract
|
Expand forever, with và0
|
Expand forever
|
Suppose we consider 3 points in space.
It has been observed that the sum of the angles inscribed
by these three points is equal to 180o. Thus it can be concluded
that it is a flat space.
How Does The Universe Expand?
Balloon
Analogy
Contrary to popular belief,
it is not as if objects are moving farther apart at the edges of the universe.
Rather the universe as a whole is expanding similar to a balloon being
inflated.
UNIVERSE AS AN EXPANDING RUBBER SHEET
Now
consider 2 points A & B w.r.t to origin at O. As the rubber sheet (our
Universe) expands, A & B go farther away from O. If A covers S1
distance and B covers S2 distance, we can say that S1 is
greater than S2. So we see that Hubble’s Law is valid since distance
of A from O is greater than that of B.
DARK ENERGY
The expansion of the universe has not been slowing down due to gravity, as everyone thought, it has been accelerating. No one expected this. No one knew how to explain it. But something was causing it. Eventually theorists came up with three sorts of explanations. Maybe it was a result of a long-discarded version of Einstein's theory of Gravity, one that contained what was called the "cosmological constant". Maybe there was some strange kind of energy-fluid that filled space. Maybe there is something wrong with Einstein's theory of gravity and a new theory could include some kind of field that would create this cosmic acceleration. Theorists still don't know what the correct explaiation is, but they have given the solution a name. It is called dark energy.
One
explanation for dark energy is that it is a new kind of dynamical energy fluid
or field, something that fills all of space but something whose effect on the
expansion of the Universe is the opposite of that of matter and normal energy.
But, if dark energy is the answer, we still don't know what it is like, what it
interacts with, or why it exists.
So
the mystery continues . . . .
References:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy/
hubblesite.org/hubble_discoveries/dark_energy/
imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/mysteries_l1/dark_energy.html
References:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy
http://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy/
hubblesite.org/hubble_discoveries/dark_energy/
imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/mysteries_l1/dark_energy.html





No comments:
Post a Comment